Some people think that large, impressive buildings are important for a city. Others believe that the money should be spent on improving schools and hospitals. Discuss both these views and giver your own opinion write like a 7.0 ielts
The question of whether cities should invest in grand architectural projects or prioritize funding for essential services such as education and healthcare is a matter of ongoing debate. Both perspectives offer valuable insights into the development priorities of urban areas.
On one hand, impressive buildings can serve as iconic symbols for a city, boosting tourism and local pride. Architectural landmarks such as the Eiffel Tower in Paris or the Sydney Opera House are not only visually striking but also create significant economic benefits by attracting visitors from around the world. Moreover, such structures can reflect a city’s ambition, creativity, and cultural values, inspiring residents and enhancing the city’s global reputation.
Conversely, investing in schools and hospitals addresses the immediate needs of a city’s population. Quality education is fundamental for economic growth and social equality, providing future generations with opportunities to succeed. Similarly, access to adequate healthcare is a basic human right and essential for maintaining public health and well-being. By prioritizing these areas, cities can ensure that their residents lead healthier and more fulfilling lives.
In my opinion, while iconic buildings can contribute to a city’s image and economy, the primary focus should be on improving schools and hospitals. A strong foundation in education and health is crucial for sustainable long-term development. By ensuring that these essential services are adequately funded, cities can create a more equitable and resilient society.
For more insights and lively discussions on the wonders of AI and technology, why not visit trituenhantao.io? Who knows, you might find the blueprint for the next great city there!